data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18d74/18d74984366d0ac2e5e778ad79740524dbab1144" alt=""
SOME NYPD HISTORY YOU MIGHT LIKE
I am reprinting the following story, which was written by MICHAEL BOSAK, as it provided some very interesting NYPD history to me, and I thought you might enjoy it as well.
Mike Bosak is a Retired NYPD Sergeant, who I have credited many times on this site, as being probably the eminent NYPD historian.
He was instrumental, along with Ret. Det1 John Reilly, for the inclusion on the 1PP wall of honor of those members who had died in the line of duty but had been omitted; many of them requiring a great deal of historical fact checking to show their death was line-of-duty related.
Anyway, the following may be categorized under the heading “Just Who Was The Highest Ranking Nasty Drunk To Get Himself Jammed Up”.
Thanks again, Mike, for all you do.
“The honor of having the reputation of being the department’s highest ranking nasty drunk to get himself jammed up belongs to none other than James Irving, who was the department’s ‘Chief of Detectives’ from Oct. 17, 1870 to Jan. 22, 1875.
Now before we get started on this little narrative, I know that there are many history buffs out there that are saying right now, “But wait a minute. I remember from my days in the academy (or John Jay), that Thomas Byrnes was NYPD’s first ‘Chief of Detectives’ and he was appointed ‘Chief of Detectives’ until March 12, 1880."
Or perhaps you’re not a history buff but read that fact in one of Thomas Reppetto's many books.
He was great for espousing that Thomas Byrnes was NYPD first ‘Chief of Detective’. BTW in Reppetto’s latest tome, NYPD: A City and Its Police he no longer refers to Thomas Byrnes as the department’s first ‘Chief of Detectives’ Wonder why?
Or just maybe, you’ve visited the Chief of Detectives Office up on the 13th Floor, where Thomas Byrnes picture hangs on the wall as the very first of many.
No matter how you came to believe that Thomas Byrnes was NYPD’s first Chief of Detectives, he wasn’t.
Thomas Byrnes was the sixth man to hold the title of ‘Chief of Detectives’ in New York, and he was ‘Chief of Detectives’ from March 12, 1880 to April 12, 1892, when he was promoted to ‘Superintendent of Police’.
By the way, it was an almost given in 19th Century New York that when you became the ‘Chief of Detectives’ you most assuredly would be the next ‘Superintendent of Police’, which today would be the rank of ‘Chief of Department’.
Incidentally, Byrnes does hold the distinction of being NYC longest serving ‘Chief of Detectives’ and by far NYC’s wealthiest cop ever.
As Chief of Detective and later as Superintendent of Police, he adeptly turned NYC into his very own cash cow. When he was forced to retire by the Teddy Roosevelt, Byrnes was obscenely rich even by today’s bloated standards.
First Some Clarification on Just Who is Who in this Sad Saga
Since we’re on this subject, I know some of you want to know just who NYPD’s first Chief of Detectives was.
That honor goes to George Washington Walling, who will play a very prominent role in this tale of drinking and belligerence.
Known to his friends as ‘Wash’ Walling, he was appointed NYC first ‘Chief of Detectives’ and placed in command “…of the entire detective and detailed forces of the department.” by the Metropolitan Board of Police Commissioners on Friday, May 14, 1858.
George ‘Wash’ Walling was a very outstanding cop; an excellent administrator and was well respected by almost all with the notable exception of NYC Mayor Fernando Wood.
Furthermore, he actually had integrity and great strength of character. Everything that Fernando Wood wasn’t.
It has to be noted here that Walling and Wood had a long history of fierce animosity towards each other. And that hated boiled over with a passion that would effect the department and the history of policing for generations to come
By the way, among NYC historians, Fernando Wood had just the opposite reputation of Walling, one of being one of the most corrupt mayors if not the most corrupt mayor that New York City has ever had the pleasure of experiencing.
This hatred between Walling and Wood would lead to George Walling stepping down as Chief of Detectives in 1860, when that Tammany hack and Tweed favorite, took office for the third and last time as the mayor of NYC.
It started when Walling was the captain of the NYC Municipal Police Department’s 18th Ward (today’s 13th Precinct). Walling refused to accept a convicted felon and known robber, who was one of Fernando Wood political hacks for appointment as a patrolmen in his command.
On April 30, 1856, the mayor had ex-councilman Bryan McCahill file trumped-up charges against Walling for, “Neglect of Duty” alleging that Captain Walling’s men failed to stop “bad boys from pegging stones” at a women’s house on East 21st Street.
Walling was found guilty in the trial room on July 11, 1856 and Fernando Wood fired him. Wood later promoted a patrolman from the mayor’s detail to the rank of captain and made that former patrolman the commanding officer of the 18th District.
‘Wash’ Walling loss of his love and livelihood would not last long. In May of 1857 he was re-appointed to the rank of captain on the Metropolitan Police.
Paybacks a Bitch
As fate would have it, George Walling just happened to be the captain that the Board of Metropolitan Police Commissioners sent over to City Hall on June 16, 1857 to collar the mayor with a felony arrest warrant for assault.
As you probably know, that little unsuccessful act at the time metamorphosed into a major violent confrontation between a detail of 200 New York City’s ‘Municipals’ allied with Mayor Wood’s personal goon squad - the ‘Pugh Uglies’ against one, five and fifty of the ‘Metropolitans’ that went into City Hall Park in the mistaken belief that Walling was in deep trouble and badly needed help.
The true tale of that battle deserves to be told later at another time. (The research is completed, but has yet to be written.)
One last thing, if you want to see what George Washington Walling actually looked like, his picture is hanging in the Chief of Department Office conference room on the 14th floor of One Police Plaza.
Now getting back to Chief of Detectives James Irving; Irving had somewhat of a reputation as one who has a fondness for fighting, not to mention a love of the drink. In other words he was a nasty drunk. Moreover, Irving wasn’t adverse to making a buck or two on the side.
With that said, let me offer this caveat, it was a different time and a different world back in 1870’s New York. Boss Tweed and Tammany Hall were at the height of their power and the New York City’s government was efficiently designed to extract every last penny from the populous.
James Irving was Tweed’s pick for NYPD’s Chief of Detectives during an era when William Marcy Tweed and Tammany Hall ran the big show.
As a young detective in the Metropolitan PD’s 20th Precinct (today’s Midtown South), an alleged intoxicated Irving crashed a New Year’s Eve Party in Turner Hall on West 35th Street at approximately 3 am on January 1, 1863. When the person who was throwing the catered party objected to Irving presence, Irving promptly gave him the beating of his life and then shot him in the chest.
As a tool of Tammany Hall, Irving beat that and many other charges over his police career. Most of which alleged that Irving was intoxicated during the alleged wrongdoings.
As good as an example of just how corrupt NYC was during this time period, among many too numerous to mention, would be an event that would spell the beginning of the end for the Chief of Detectives career.
On October 20, 1873, NYPD’s Chief Clerk Seth C. Hawley preferred charges against Chief of Detectives James Irving.
Hawley on behalf of the Board of Police Commissioners, alleging that the ‘Chief of Detectives’ took a $6,000 bribe from a gang of forgers, who had just ripped off the Bank of England in an elaborate scheme staged in London in March of 1873 for over a million dollars in U.S. currency. Incidentally, the NYPD ‘Chief of Detectives’ annual salary in 1873 was $2,000 a year.
To make a long story short, London’s Metropolitan Police Chief of Detectives Bailey had telegraphed the NYPD with the particulars of the larceny, and that the forgers were heading to New York on the steamship ‘Thuringia’ with the money.
James Irving, being no slouch, got right on the case and decided to handle it himself. He ordered the 24th Pct. (The steamboat Seneca) to take him and one detective out to meet the Thuringia. Irving and the detective represented themselves as U.S. Marshall without mentioning that they were NYPD, and a deal to cut the forgers loose was consummated.
London’s Metropolitan Police, being no slouches in the crime suppression business, also arraigned to have a detective from Montreal, Canada assigned to meet the steamboat as did the New York Stock Exchange. Note that Canada was still a British Province.
When the Montreal detective and the NY Stock Exchange detectives were refused access to the forgers and the counterfeiters were cut lose, somehow or other these detectives smelled a rat and telegraphed London.
London’s Metropolitan Police and the Bank of England then conducted their own investigation.
When the Deputy U.S Counsel General assigned to London, who just happened to be present on the steamboat and witnessed Irving’s conduct with the forgers, agreed to testify as a prosecution witness for the Bank of England, the die was cast.
Britain’s Ambassador to the United States contacted Board of Police Commissioners with their evidence, who then ordered the NYPD Chief Clerk to prefer against Irving and his detective accomplice.
In the department’s trail room, believe it or not, Irving beat all the charges and squashed any chance of being charged criminally. You’re just not going to believe how all this was done. Incidentally, you could make a movie out of this.
The fix is in
Former longtime N.Y. County District Attorney and Ex- NYC Mayor A. Oakley Hall represented Irving as his defense attorney.
Oakley in a brilliant defense blamed it on a mix-up in communications with London’s Chief of Detectives, Inspector Bailey, and on an attempt by the New York’s Sheriff’s Office to embarrass the NYPD.
Then Mathew T. Brennan, a former detective and captain of the old 6th Precinct that covered the ‘Five Points’, and who also just happened to be a former NYPD Police Commissioner and the current Sheriff of New York County, took the stand and testified in the defense of Irving. He claimed that it was two of his deputy sheriffs that had extorted the bribe from the forgers.
Brennan even had two of his hacks to act as ‘straw men’ ready to take the fall for Irving and his accomplice, Det. Philip Farley if things went wrong.
In a nutshell, on November 10, 1873, Oakley on a technicality had the evidence against Irving and Farley thrown out. The Bank of England then chose to withdraw their complaint.
This didn’t sit well with Walling as we shall soon see in January of 1875.
Incidentally as a side note, less than 3 months later, Brennan would be indicted for and occupy the very same Ludlow Street jail that he was accused of helping Boss Tweed escape from.
On July 23, 1874 the Board of Police Commissioners promoted Walling to the position of ‘Superintendent of Police’ and James Irving’s fortune was about to take a turn for the worst.
As Chief of Detectives, Irving had the reputation of being an abusive drunk, but one that was hung like a bull moose with Tammany Hall; something that didn’t sit well with Walling and most of the other ranking brass.
So when Tammany Hall’s abuses came to light and its powers began to wane, the opportunity to do Irving finally presented itself.
A New York Sun Police Reporter Does Chief of Detectives In
In January of 1875 ‘The Shack,’ where most of the city’s newspapers police reporters hung around waiting for a crime story, was located at 301 Mulberry Street, just across the street from the ‘Central Office of Police’
On a side note the ‘Shack’ was originally located in the basement of the ‘Central Office of Police’ 300 Mulberry Street. But when Superintendent of Police John Kennedy found one the reporters snooping around his office shortly after the Civil War Draft Riots, Kennedy had all the reporters ejected from the building. The ‘Shack’ is now located on the 2nd floor of 1 PP next to the office of the Deputy Commish for Community Affairs.
So when the Sun ran an article that James Irving didn't quite appreciate, Irving went across the street to express his displeasure. William Corkran, a police reporter for the New York Sun was confronted by an intoxicated and belligerent Irving in his office at 301 Mulberry Street and got the blunt of Irving fury. According to Corkran, Irving accused Corkran of being a thief and “otherwise abused him” without any cause or provocation.
On January 11, 1874, the Chief of Detectives was arraigned before the Board of Police Commissioner on a charge of “Improper Conduct” for his confrontation with Corkran.
In the trial room, Irving denied the allegations and alleged that Corkran attempted to eavesdrop on him. It was alleged that the Chief of Detectives said to Corkran, “You are a scoundrel. You are a liar. You don’t tell the truth. You are more dangerous than a thief, for you can watch a thief, but not a liar.” Irving said that he was prompted to use such language to Corkran on account of false reports that had been published in the Sun.
On January 22, 1875, President of the Board of Police Commissions George Matsell submitted a resolution to the Board of Police Commissioners to removed Captain James Irving as ‘Chief of Detectives’ and the board votes unanimously to do so.
NYPD Travel Therapy – 1875 Style
Walling then transferred the disgraced former Chief of Detectives to the 24 Precinct, better known as the steamboat Seneca - the very tool Irving had successfully used to extort the bribe money from the Bank of England swindlers. Anybody think that there was a little message attached to this transfer?
No replacement for the ‘Chief of Detectives’ was named and the detective force was placed under the direct command of the ‘Superintendent of Police’ George Walling. (Remember George Walling was the first ‘Chief of Detectives’)
The Board of Police Commissioners then orders that the outer door to the ‘Chief of Detectives Officer from the main hallway of 300 Mulberry Street (Central Office of Police) be “closed up, and no person will be allowed to pass in or out of the Detective Office, except through the Superintendent’s or Inspectors’ Offices.”
Note: The office of Chief of Detective would remain vacant and under the direct command of the ‘Superintendent of Police’ until September 13, 1878, when Capt. James Kealy was promoted to Chief of Detectives.
1875 Police Administration Lesson of the Day – Never Let the Department Drunk Drive the Department’s One and Only Steamboat.
The Seneca wasn’t exactly a tiny little thing like one of today’s police launches. It was a wood hulled side-wheeler, 105 feet long, 33 feet wide with a draft of 12 feet that belched big clouds of black smoke wherever it went. Not exactly easy to hide.
James Irving promptly turned the Seneca into his very own party boat and managed to smash it into a rock that badly crush the steamboat’s starboard’s paddle box, almost destroying the boat according to the N.Y. Times. This brought Irving once again to the department’s attention.
“Irregularities having been suspected in his management in his new position, a watch was kept upon him.”
Once again the Board of Police Commissioners brought charges against Irving for “Improper Conduct and violations of the rules of the department.” The Seneca and Irving having been shadowed 24 x 7 for almost two weeks, Irving was observed personally entering liquor stores in full uniform and stocking the boat with booze. He even steamed out to Long Beach to party.
Irving was charged with ten (10) specifications; specifically that he took the steamboat on “pleasure excursions”.
Irving in a desperate attempt to beat the charges even brought in the notorious Captain Alexander ‘Clubber’ Williams as a defense witness to testify for him. All to no avail.
The Saga's Sad Ending
On October 23, 1875 the Board of Police Commissioners found the former Chief of Detectives guilty on all charges and Irving was “dismissed from the force” In addition, all the sergeants, roundsmen and patrolmen assigned to the Seneca were transferred to other commands throughout the city.
INTERESTING WEB SITES: MEDIA ISSUES IN THE NEWS
Here’s an interesting story about some tactics that have come under question, used by the San Francisco PD, to spy on reporters in an effort to find out who was leaking information to the press.
http://www.sfweekly.com/Issues/2006-09-27/news/feature.html
(You may have to “cut and paste” the site; I don’t think it will link to it directly by clicking on it – but you probably already know that!).
In case you aren’t aware of it, the corporate world has been turning upside down recently over reports that the Board of Directors of giant Hewlett-Packard Corporation had been under secret investigation into information that was being leaked to the press.
What information? Well, apparently corporate strategy, discussed at Board meetings, was showing up on news sites, jeopardizing the effectiveness of the strategy as it was being revealed to its rivals.
What H-P did was hire some private investigative firm, after referral from their corporate Global Security people, to do some investigating.
What they did, though, has resulted in massive disruption of the company, congressional hearings, and firings of top executives.
The procedure used by the investigators consisted of obtaining Board Members telephone records, seeking to find out who had contact with media people.
This wasn’t so bad – but the fact that they did so by obtaining the records through PRETEXTING – which basically means they pretended to be the phone subscriber when they requested the records from the phone companies.
That’s not “proper” – and borders on being illegal.
There is a statute in California that prohibits “pretexting” – and Congress is sure to be considering enacting a similar federal law.
The H-P investigators did not have the ability to subpoena phone records on their own, and had not been able to mask the investigation under a criminal statute in order to obtain them without the subscriber’s cooperation. While the leaking of corporate information was a very real threat to the company, and its profits & losses –which impacts on stockholders – they apparently did not want to bring in federal authorities who may have been able to find some obscure, vague SEC statute to hold against the parties. However, knowing the speed at which the federal authorities operate, I’m sure H-P wanted answers much sooner than the next millennium. Besides, there really is no criminal statute for leaking corporate information to the press, although there probably is some civil matter associated with it.
You can read some of what has been going on at this site:
http://news.com.com/2100-1014_3-6115509.html
and surely, if you Google “HP LEAK”, you’ll have more than enough reading to take you through the week.